A Victorian Lot Owner is wondering whether all owners should be able to access the chair lift. Alex Smale, Owners Corporation Manager at The Knight suggests the best solution would be to using a key safe.
Table of Contents:
- QUESTION: Owners need to attend a security audit, or fobs will be disabled. It’s inconvenient for our property manager, who has a fob, to attend. Is the committee being reasonable?
- QUESTION: If an owner rents out his lot, can he still return to the building and use the facilities, or has he passed on this benefit to his tenant?
- QUESTION: If our doors are lot property, can the owners corporation force owners to change to a registered key system? We don’t want the owners corporation to have unauthorised access to our lot.
Question: Owners need to attend a security audit, or fobs will be disabled. It’s inconvenient for our property manager, who has a fob, to attend. Is the committee being reasonable?
Our property in an apartment block is managed by a property manager. Our committee are conducting an audit on access fobs/swipes/remotes. They’ve asked residents to make an appointment to present their fobs for the audit, or the fob will be disabled. The property manager has a fob, their office isn’t nearby, and they can’t attend the audit.
- Is it reasonable to expect lot owners to attend an in person meeting?
- Could this be a regular event?
- Can I request to be exempt from this process?
Answer: It does not sound like the committee is being unreasonable as long as you have been given ample notice and provided with appointment options.
The security of your owners corporation is a valid concern for your community, and it sounds like your committee is taking it seriously.
Access devices can often be lost and sometimes stolen (e.g. if a car gets broken into in the car park), which can mean access to your property is compromised, leading to break-ins, theft and vandalism. Audits on access devices can help combat this. The frequency will depend on factors such as the size of your property, the type of devices available, and the turnover of residents in the community.
Generally, an audit will involve checking the serial number of a device against what is on record. The committee could accept the serial number (rather than needing to physically present the device), but some systems will not have serial numbers, and therefore, a physical inspection may be required.
If this type of audit has never been completed, or not for some time, there may be no records of the devices. In this case, the thoroughness of a physical inspection and cancelling those not presented could make sense. This would benchmark the current position and ensure the ongoing security of the community.
While we appreciate the inconvenience of having to present your devices, it does not sound like the committee is being unreasonable as long as you have been given ample notice and provided with various appointment options.
Check if your OC would accept the serial number (if available) or photographs instead of physically presenting the device. However, if this is not possible, it might be best to accommodate the committee’s request and enjoy the peace of mind of a secure and proactive OC.
The Knight
Email
P: 03 9509 3144
Question: If an owner rents out his lot, can he still return to the building and use the facilities, or has he passed on this benefit to his tenant?
Our Strata complex has facilities for residents. An owner has moved out of his apartment, rented his property, and retained a key to the facilities. The owner returns to the property several times weekly and uses the facilities. Does the owners corporation have a right to ask him to cease this activity as he has passed on his right to the facilities by renting out his apartment?
Answer: It may be difficult to enforce your request without anything explicit in the rules.
The first (and best) place to check is the owners corporation’s registered rules, as they may specify the terms surrounding the use of common facilities.
In the absence of anything explicit in the rules, it may be difficult to enforce your request. I imagine most owners would agree that the intention is for residents only to use the facilities. However, there is an argument that if an owner is paying owners corporation fees, why can’t they use the facilities?
One of the newer model rules, 4.1.7, outlines the following:
- The owners corporation may impose reasonable conditions on a lot owner’s right or an occupier’s right to access or use common property to protect the quiet enjoyment, safety and security of other lot owners, including but not limited to imposing operating hours on facilities such as gymnasiums and swimming pools.
My suggested approach would be to contact the owner, request that he stop using the facilities (given he doesn’t reside there), and substantiate the request through either the relevant registered rule or model rule 4.1.7. If he continues using the facilities, I would consider obtaining legal advice.
Callum Wilson
The Strata Shepherd
E: [email protected]
P: 0431 925 908
This post appears in the December 2023 edition of The VIC Strata Magazine.
Question: If our doors are lot property, can the owners corporation force owners to change to a registered key system? We don’t want the owners corporation to have unauthorised access to our lot.
Our owners corporation is forcing all lot owners to change their lot door locks. The new system has a registered key, and the owners corporation will have access to that key system.
Are the doors lot property or common property? If they are lot property, can the owners corporation demand this?
We do not want the owners corporation to have unauthorised access to our apartment.
Answer: If access to your lot is required, the owners corporation must give you a Notice of Entry under the Act.
The owners corporation cannot force owners to update the door locks to a registered lock system.
Assuming the locks are private property, the owners corporation doesn’t have the right to change locks or force migration to a registered key system (regardless of whether or not they pass a special resolution).
The owners corporation has no authority to request or hold any keys to your private property. If access to your lot is needed, the owners corporation is obligated to provide you with a Notice of Entry as required by the Act, ensuring your privacy and rights as a property owner are respected.
Additionally, if your owners corporation has implemented a registered key system to enhance the overall security of the building, it is necessary to have a registered installer cut your key. In the event of a security breach, it is advisable to have a registered installer replace the hardware, as a regular locksmith cannot duplicate your apartment key. It’s important to note that the owners corporation manager, chairperson, or any committee member is not permitted to possess copies of keys to your private property.
Ali Kaymakam
MBCM Strata Specialists
E: [email protected]
P: 1300 777 276
This post appears in the August 2023 edition of The VIC Strata Magazine.
This article is for reference purposes only and is not intended to be a comprehensive review of the developments in the law and practice or to cover all aspect of the subject matter. It does not constitute legal or other advice and should not be relied upon this way. Readers should take legal or other advice before applying the information containing in this publication.
Read Next:
- What’s yours and what‘s common property?
- VIC: Q&A Conflict of Interest on the Committee?
- VIC: Q&A Expenses Recovery and Benefits of Common Property
Visit our Maintenance and Common Property OR Strata Title Information Victoria
Looking for strata information concerning your state? For state-specific strata information, try here.
After a free PDF of this article? Log into your existing LookUpStrata Account to download the printable file. Not a member? Simple – join for free on our Registration page.
Leave a Reply