Question: What are the risks of a Qld body corporate using unlicensed trades? Can we bypass the need to engage licensed tradespeople for common property repairs by breaking the invoice into smaller amounts?
I’m an owner in a commercial scheme in QLD. Recently, the committee proposed maintenance work for fallen wall tiles and rectified some plumbing issues. The chair appointed a handyman to remove old tiles, sand off existing gyprock walls and retile the walls. A plumber carried out the plumbing work.
Is it against QLD legislation to hire unlicensed trade for tiling work on common area toilets? The chair insisted that by breaking the invoice into small invoices, we can bypass using a licensed tradesperson as the invoiced amounts fall within the handyman’s limit.
Answer: The question for body corporate is, what do you do if something goes wrong?
The QBCC standards are clear on the requirements for when a contractor must carry a licence.
As per their website, individuals and companies must hold a QBCC licence to carry out building work that is:
- valued over $3,300
- valued over $1,100 where it involves Hydraulic Services Design
- of any value where it involves:
- drainage
- plumbing and drainage
- gas fitting
- termite management – chemical
- fire protection
- completed residential building inspection
- building design – low rise, medium rise and open
- site classification
- mechanical services
Body corporate committees have a duty of care to all owners to act in their best interests, including acting legally, so they should follow these rules.
However, it’s not uncommon for people to try and get around the regulations using the justification provided here – split up the invoices so they are under the required levels.
If they do that and the contractor does the work with no issues, then that might be OK. It’s easy to understand the inclination to stick with a contractor you know and trust.
However, the question for body corporate is, what do you do if something goes wrong? If the contractor bodges the work or disappears with your deposit, the body corporate could be stuck with the bill.
If something more serious happens, such as an accident or injury onsite, the situation could escalate, and in the worst scenario, the body corporate could face liability issues. Committee members who have approved the works could face the blame.
You might want to ask the committee whether it is worth taking on these risks just to get the handyman you want.
Remember that approval for works like this is a committee decision, a decision of the whole committee provided it is within the spending limits. The chair has one vote, but the decision should be made by the majority. Perhaps if you explain some of the risks to the committee, they will vote with that in mind.
If the committee does proceed, you might have to consider what to do next. Perhaps you could advise your insurer. They wouldn’t be very happy about this scenario. Maybe you could submit an owner’s motion to force a vote on the issue and help make the matter more public. If there is a regular practice of appointing unqualified contractors, you may need to escalate from there. Advise owners by mail out, propose motions to the next general meeting or take the matter to the commissioner’s office, as required. These last options are usually the final options, but they are what you have to look at if you have a committee engaging in unsafe practices.
William Marquand
Tower Body Corporate
E: willmarquand@towerbodycorporate.com.au
P: 07 5609 4924
Leave a Reply