Enter your email Address

  • Home
  • What is strata?
    • Strata Legislation
    • What is Strata?
    • Strata Finance
  • Strata Topics
    • Strata Information By State
      • New South Wales
      • Queensland
      • Victoria
      • Australian Capital Territory
      • South Australia
      • Tasmania
      • Western Australia
      • Northern Territory
    • Strata Information By Topic
      • COVID-19
      • By-Laws & Legislation
      • Smoking
      • Parking
      • Noise & Neighbours
      • Insurance
      • Pets
      • Your Levies
      • New Law Reform
      • Maintenance & Common Property
      • Committee Concerns
      • NBN & Telecommunications
      • Building Defects
      • Renting / Selling / Buying Property
      • Strata Managers
      • Building Managers & Caretakers
      • Strata Plan / Strata Inspection Report
      • Apartment Living Sustainability
  • Blog
    • Newsletter Archives
  • The Strata Magazine
    • The NSW Strata Magazine
    • The QLD Strata Magazine
    • The VIC Strata Magazine
    • The WA Strata Magazine
  • Advertise With Us
    • Site Sponsors
    • LookUpStrata Site Advertising
    • Your Own Branded Newsletter
  • About Us
    • Testimonials for LookUpStrata
  • Help
    • Ask A Strata Question
    • Q&As – about the LookUpStrata site
    • Sitemap

LookUpStrata

Australia's Strata Title Information Site

Whitbread Insurance Brokers
Australia's Top Property Blog Dedicated to Strata Living
You are here: Home / Pets / Pets NSW / NSW: Do Not Let Sleeping Dogs Lie! Why Playing the Waiting Game Could be Your Undoing

NSW: Do Not Let Sleeping Dogs Lie! Why Playing the Waiting Game Could be Your Undoing

Published November 12, 2020 By Adrian Mueller, JS Mueller & Co Lawyers 6 Comments Last Updated November 17, 2020

Sharing is caring!

0shares

This article on what to do about your by-law prohibiting pets has been provided by Adrian Mueller, JS Mueller & Co Lawyers.

How will you respond to the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in the Cooper case which says that a by-law prohibiting pets is invalid? Will you wait for the dust to settle before deciding what you will do? Or will you act now and change any by-law that prohibits pets? In this article, we take a closer look at each of these approaches and recommend why playing the waiting game could be your undoing.

GET NOTIFIED WHEN WE PUBLISH NEW Q&AS, NEWS AND ARTICLES TO THE SITE

Introduction

On 12 October 2020, the NSW Court of Appeal concluded that a by-law prohibiting the keeping of pets in the Horizon building in Sydney is invalid. This decision means that any “no pets” by-law is invalid. So where does this leave an owners corporation which has a “no pets” by-law? And what should an owners corporation with a “no pets” by-law do?

Advert NSW Mag Banner

The wait and see approach

There are many owners corporations that intend to wait for the dust to settle following the decision in the Cooper case before deciding on what they will do about their “no pets” by-law. Indeed, some of these owners corporations take the view that their “no pets” by-law is valid until it is overturned by NCAT or a Court. So, the “no pets” by-laws in these buildings will remain for the time being.

The Proactive approach

There are other owners corporations that are getting on the front foot. These owners corporations are replacing their “no pets” by-law with a new by-law that restricts the keeping of pets and imposes conditions on owners and occupiers who are allowed to keep pets under the new by-law. Most of the new by-laws introduced by these owners corporations will require owners and occupiers to apply to the owners corporation for permission to keep pets, prevent the owners corporation unreasonably withholding that approval and contain conditions (sometimes extensive) which pet owners will need to comply with.

What to do?

So which approach is to be preferred? The wait and see approach or the proactive approach? In our view, the owners corporations that are doing nothing about their “no pets” by-law are making a big mistake. This is because a “no pets” by-law is not enforceable. This invites trouble. Why? Because if an owner or occupier brings a pet into a “no pets” building there will be virtually nothing the owners corporation can do about it. If the owners corporation decides to belatedly replace the “no pets” by-law, after the owner or occupier brings the pet into the building, it will be too late to rely on the new by-law to insist on the pet being removed from the building. An owners corporation in that position could end up getting stuck with pets that are brought into the building whilst the unenforceable “no pets” by-law remains.

Conclusion

The preferable approach is for any owners corporation that has a “no pets” by-law to replace that bylaw as soon as possible with a new by-law that reflects the contemporary views of owners and, if appropriate, restricts (but does not prohibit) the keeping of pets in the building and requires owners and occupiers who want to keep pets to apply for approval of the owners corporation to do so and contains reasonable conditions that regulate the keeping of pets that are approved by the owners corporation. This is the approach that is to be preferred following the decision in the Cooper case. Any owners corporations that wait for the dust to settle following that decision before changing their pets by-law may well live to regret that decision.

This post appears in Strata News #427.

If you have a question about how to respond to the by-law prohibiting pets being invalid or something to add to the article, please leave a comment below.

Embed

Adrian Mueller
Partner + Senior Lawyer
JS Mueller & Co Lawyers
E. [email protected]
W. https://muellers.com.au/
P: 02 9562 1266

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is provided for your personal information only. It is not meant to be legal or professional advice nor should it be used as a substitute for such advice. You should seek legal advice for your specific circumstances before relying on any information herein. Contact JS Mueller & Co for any required legal assistance.

JS Mueller & Co Lawyers has been servicing the strata industry across metropolitan and regional NSW for over 40 years. We are a specialist firm of strata lawyers with in depth and unmatched experience in, and comprehensive knowledge of strata law and levy collection.

Read next:

  • NSW By-Laws & Strata Pets: What is harsh unconscionable or oppressive?
  • NSW: Q&A Our Committee is Rescinding the Keeping of Pets ByLaw

This article has been republished with permission from the author and first appeared on the JS Mueller & Co Lawyers website.

Visit our Strata By-Laws and Legislation, Strata Pets Living in Apartments OR NSW Strata Legislation

Looking for strata information concerning your state? For state-specific strata information, take a look here.

After a free PDF of this article? Log into your existing LookUpStrata Account to download the printable file. Not a member? Simple – join for free on our Registration page.

Comments

  1. AvatarRobert Ennew says

    January 4, 2021 at 7:24 am

    So what are the NSW strata bylaws now for renters in regards to, landlord stating ‘no pets allowed’ especially in a pet friendly building prior to the Cooper case at Horizon Apartments.
    May a landlord still say ‘no pets’ in a lease agreement?

    Reply
  2. AvatarRobert Ennew says

    January 4, 2021 at 7:12 am

    I live in a pet friendly building well ahead of time, [removed] Apartments Wollongong NSW 2500. The stipulations strata committee put on pets, was under 10kg approved on application, if over 10kg seek approval, application may incur a fee if a ‘special meeting needs to be convened’ at [removed] strata; despite application being in well before deadline for next meeting’s agenda, January 2019. [removed] Strata management, had plenty of opportunity to bring it up in meetings, but they chose to just take my money, ignore mentioning it, & then threaten owner & occupier for it’s removal (assistance dog Mind Dogs Australia, over 10kg) despite never receiving complaints from owner occupiers prior to pet application. This is an example of an absent strata committee, being taken for a ride by poor decisions of their strata managing agents.

    Reply
  3. AvatarAkuna Pet Resort says

    December 12, 2020 at 5:26 am

    I think the problem is exaggerated. It seems to me that you overestimate the significance of this event. Moreover, we already went to such a state of affairs, didn’t we? So why are you surprised? Court decisions, in my opinion, will not fundamentally change anything in the lives of pet owners. By the way, since it comes to that, I disagree with you and think that the best solution is to do nothing. Why stir up panic and get nervous ahead of time? But this is just my opinion, I didn’t want to offend or offend anyone. He just said 🙂 I hope everyone will be happy in the end.

    Reply
  4. AvatarKevin says

    November 13, 2020 at 4:12 pm

    Hi, regarding the recent decision to allow pets in to a strata, that has a no pet policy.
    We have a small strata ,with a no pet policy, .this by law, was adopted by 75%
    Of the until occupier’s. Does the recent ruling trample on their rights, why should a minority enforce their will on a majority. Surely they have the right to live in a no pet environment.
    The pet owners have a right to choose to live in a pet friendly area, or, with this recent decision, were there particular reasons that awarded that decision, if so
    Under what conditions can a no pet policy still be effective.. thanks.

    Reply
  5. AvatarHS1947 says

    November 13, 2020 at 9:12 am

    My experience is that the statutory “Must obtain Approval” irrespective of whether it’s a pet, minor or major renovations and changes to structure and appearance of common property, is regularly ignored by Tenants,by Owners and by Rental Agents for Investment owners who abuse the process of the protocol and cause the Executive Committee of Owners Corporation immense grief, time and effort to pursue rectifications and remedy. This abuse has become so systemic Yet, in pursuing remedy the Committee is expected to jump over hurdles, barriers and through hoops, not to mention the dealings with passive duty of care Strata Managers who don’t give a fig… The Owners corporation committee are expected to run to a Mediation and then to NCAT with its limited powers, all at the cost of the committees precious time and legal costs to the Owners Corporation.. The whole system stinks ! The abusers are laughing at the system.

    Reply
    • AvatarEdith Diamond says

      November 13, 2020 at 9:46 am

      It is easier to beg for forgiveness than to seek approval.
      It’s hard work to issue fines and to follow through but it will make owners think twice before committing another offense.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search For Strata Articles

  • Advert Stratabox
  • StrataBox Advert
  • Advert: StrataLoans
  • Advert: StrataLoans
  • Advert: StrataLoans
Subscribe Newsletter

TESTIMONIAL

"The newsletter is very helpful and gives great guidance with commonly asked questions." Gayle, Lot Owner – November 2020
"I love your regular emails and now this fantastic magazine! Keep up the great work. " David, Lot Owner – August 2020

Quick Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Categories

  • COVID-19
  • Ask A Strata Question
  • New South Wales
  • Queensland
  • Victoria
  • Australian Capital Territory
  • South Australia
  • Tasmania
  • Western Australia
  • Northern Territory
  • ByLaws & Legislation
  • Smoking
  • Parking
  • Noise & Neighbours
  • Insurance
  • Pets
  • Levies
  • Law Reform
  • Maintenance & Common Property
  • Committee Concerns
  • NBN & Telecommunications
  • Building Defects
  • Renting / Selling / Buying
  • Strata Managers
  • Building Managers and Caretakers
  • Strata Reports / Plans
  • Sustainability

Recent Comments

  • an after thought on The Guide to Window Locks Legislation NSW
  • tim doherty on The Guide to Window Locks Legislation NSW
  • N/A on NSW: Q&A Duty to Maintain and Repair Common Property
  • Liza Admin on QLD: Q&A What to do About Illegal Acts in Apartments
  • KMA on WA: Strata by-law consolidation: some tips on how to approach the new rules
  • Liza Admin on NSW: Q&A Can We Have BBQs or a Small Fire Pit on the Apartment Balcony?
  • paulsiulepa on NSW: Q&A Proxies and Voting Rules for Owners Corporation Meetings
  • Jason Robards on QLD: Permissions for Installing Solar Panels in Strata
  • Mack on NSW: COVID-19 Legal FAQs: Strata Solutions & Toolkit – Maintenance & Safety
  • HugoSachs on NSW: STRA Code of Conduct to commence in December 2020

WEBSITE INFORMATION

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions of Use
  • Terms of Use for Comments and Community Discussion
  • Advertising Disclosure
  • Sitemap

SCA Membership

SCA WA Membership

ASK A STRATA QUESTION

Disclaimer

The opinions and/or views expressed on the LookUpStrata site, including, but not limited to, our blogs and comments, represent the thoughts of individual bloggers and our online communities, and not those necessarily of LookUpStrata Pty Ltd. In all instances, information should not be taken as advice and independent legal advice should be consulted.

CONTACT US VIA EMAIL

Copyright © 2021 · LookUpStrata ® Pty Ltd · All rights reserved