ACT: Q&A Commercial in Confidence: Why can’t I view the maintenance works contract?

This question about viewing a maintenance contract and whether it really is commercial in confidence has been answered by Christopher Kerin, Kerin Benson Lawyers.

Question: Our Executive Committee has signed a Contract with a project manager to undertake major roof works on behalf of the Owners Corporation. We have been told the contract is “Commercial in Confidence” and that only the Executive Committee are able to see it. Why?

GET THE LATEST STRATA NEWS / ARTICLES DIRECT TO YOUR INBOX HERE

Our Executive Committee has signed a Contract with a project manager to undertake major roof works on behalf of the Owners Corporation.

Many owners would like to see the terms of the Contract which involves expenditure by owners of some $700,000.

We have been told that it is “Commercial in Confidence” and that only the Executive Committee are able to see it.

Such a condition was not agreed by Owners at the AGM at which the roof works were approved. Nor was it mentioned before the Contract was signed.

It is my understanding that as all owners legally constitute the signing party which is paying the costs, we are entitled to see the complete Contract.

The project manager has stated that a redacted version may be viewed under supervision, in his office and with no notes to be taken.

Work is about to start, so what can be the problem?

Answer: The commercial in confidence term cannot prevent the document from being inspected (in full) by eligible persons.

In reply to the question, I set out the relevant provisions of the Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 below. These are fairly self-explanatory:

Section 119

119 Unit title certificate and access to owners corporation records

1. On request by an eligible person for a unit or the common property for a certificate (the unit title certificate), the owners corporation must, within 14 days after the day the request is received, give the person the certificate under the seal of the corporation giving the information about the unit or common property determined by the Minister.
2. A determination is a disallowable instrument.
3. On request by an eligible person for a unit or the common property to inspect the records of an owners corporation, the corporation must, within 14 days after the day the request is received, allow the person—
   1. to inspect:
      1. the information on the corporate register; and
      2. any other records held by the corporation; and(b) to take copies of any document inspected.
4. If a dispute exists, the owners corporation may withhold from inspection documents subject to legal professional privilege in relation to the dispute.
5. A request under this section must be in writing accompanied by a fee fixed by the owners corporation of not more than an amount determined by the Minister.
6. A determination is a disallowable instrument.

Section 121

121 Failure to provide information or certificate—offence

1. If an owners corporation for a units plan fails to comply with a request under this part for information or a unit title certificate, each executive member of the corporation at the time of the failure commits an offence.
   Maximum penalty: 50 penalty units.
2. It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subsection (1) if the defendant proves that:
   1. the person requesting the information, when asked by someone acting for the owners corporation, did not give the corporation reasonable grounds to believe that the person was an eligible person; or
   2. the defendant took reasonable steps to ensure that the request was complied with; or
   3. the failure to comply with the request happened without the defendant’s knowledge.

Dictionary

Finally, the Dictionary to the Unit Titles (Management) Act defines eligible person as:

eligible person, for a unit or common property in relation to which access to information is required, means:

1. the owner, or another person with an interest in the unit, or in an easement over the common property; or
2. for a unit that is owned, or part-owned, by a company—the representative of the company; or
3. anyone authorised in writing by a person mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b); or
4. if access to the information is necessary or desirable for the administration of this Act—the planning and land authority.

In short, the commercial in confidence term cannot prevent the document from being inspected (in full) by eligible persons.

Finally, it would be prudent for the owners corporation, given the sum involved, to have a lawyer review the terms of the contract for the work. I have reviewed dozens of these contracts and there are inevitably issues in relation to these contracts either in the manner in which the contract is documented or even in relation to basic issues like the calculation of the contract sum amount.

This post appears in Strata News #177.

Read next:

• NSW & ACT: By-Laws & Rules – What are they? Who do they bind? Can they be enforced?
• ACT Case Note: How to Count the Numbers – Voting Requirements in Unit Plans

Christopher Kerin
Kerin Benson Lawyers
P: 02 8706 7060
E: [email protected]

After more detailed information dealing with Strata Law in the ACT? Chris Kerin’s Guide to ACT Strata Law is now available.

This article is not intended to be personal advice and you should not rely on it as a substitute for any form of advice.

Visit our Strata Building Defects OR Australian Capital Territory Strata Legislation