Enter your email Address

LookUpStrata

Strata Information Leading to Open Discussion

advert Lannock strata finance
Australia's Top Property Blog Dedicated to Strata Living
  • Home
  • What is strata?
    • Strata Legislation – Rules and ByLaws
    • What is Strata?
    • Glossary of NSW Strata Terms and Jargon
    • Understand Strata Management with this Five-Minute Guide
    • Cracking the Strata Fees Code
    • Strata Finance
  • Strata Topics
    • Strata Information By State
      • New South Wales
      • Queensland
      • Victoria
      • Australian Capital Territory
      • South Australia
      • Tasmania
      • Western Australia
      • Northern Territory
    • Strata Information By Topic
      • By-Laws & Legislation
      • Smoking
      • Parking
      • Noise & Neighbours
      • Insurance
      • Pets
      • Your Levies
      • New Law Reform
      • Maintenance & Common Property
      • Committee Concerns
      • NBN & Telecommunications
      • Building Defects
      • Renting / Selling / Buying Property
      • Strata Managers
      • Building Managers & Caretakers
      • Strata Plan / Strata Inspection Report
      • Apartment Living Sustainability
    • Strata Webinars
      • NSW Strata Webinars
      • QLD Strata Webinars
      • VIC Strata Webinars
      • ACT Strata Webinars
      • SA Strata Webinars
      • WA Strata Webinars
    • Upcoming and FREE Strata Events
  • Blog
    • Newsletter Archives
  • The Strata Magazine
    • The NSW Strata Magazine
    • The QLD Strata Magazine
    • The VIC Strata Magazine
    • The WA Strata Magazine
  • Advertise With Us
    • Site Sponsors
  • About Us
    • Testimonials for LookUpStrata
  • Help
    • Ask A Strata Question
    • Q&As – about the LookUpStrata site
    • Sitemap
Home » Defects » Defects QLD » QLD: Q&A Vacant Possession for Repairs to Common Property

QLD: Q&A Vacant Possession for Repairs to Common Property

Published June 27, 2019 By The LookUpStrata Team 2 Comments Last Updated May 26, 2025

Share with your strata community

2 shares
  • Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

A Qld lot owner would like to know who pays for accommodation when vacant possession is required for repairs to common property. Frank Higginson, Hynes Legal provides the following response.

Table of Contents:

  • QUESTION: If our building requires hot water pipe maintenance that results in no hot water for some time, is the body corporate responsible for resident’s temporary accommodation?
  • QUESTION: Who is responsible for accommodation costs when a lot owner vacates for a builder to carry out repairs under warranty?
  • QUESTION: Can our Body Corporate demand Vacant Possession to undertake waterproofing repairs to common property? With no choice to stay in the unit, shouldn’t alternative accommodation be supplied at their cost?

CLICK HERE TO BE NOTIFIED WHEN WE PUBLISH CONTENT TO THE SITE

Question: If our building requires hot water pipe maintenance that results in no hot water for some time, is the body corporate responsible for resident’s temporary accommodation?

Our building may require significant and urgent hot water pipe maintenance, resulting in no hot water access for a period of time. Is the body corporate required to pay for resident’s temporary accommodation during the work? In QLD, the rental minimum standards to be considered habitable require hot running water.

Answer: All owners may be in the same position, so they would be funding their own loss and damage via the body corporate.

Todd Garsden, Mahoneys:

A body corporate’s strict maintenance obligation means that any time an element falls out of good condition, the obligation is breached. Breach of a statutory obligation can give rise to liability if an owner or occupier suffers loss.

Accordingly, there is not necessarily an entitlement to “alternative accommodation”, but if there is quantifiable loss, the owner or occupier may be able to recover that from the body corporate.

In some circumstances this is academic, as all owners may be in the same position so they would be funding their own loss and damage via the body corporate. The quantum of loss also regularly pales in comparison to the cost burden of evidence and proceedings to make any such claim against the body corporate.

Tyrone Shandiman, Strata Insurance Solutions:

From an insurance perspective, claims for loss of rent or accommodation costs are generally only considered where insured damage renders the property uninhabitable. In this instance, the issue appears to relate to piping works. It’s unclear whether the cause is due to insured damage or a non-insurable matter such as defects, wear and tear, gradual deterioration, or general maintenance. If the latter applies, insurance is unlikely to respond to either the event or any resulting loss of rent.

If a legal claim is made against the body corporate—for example, alleging a breach of statutory duty—there may be scope for cover under the legal defence costs section of the policy subject to the terms, conditions, and exclusions.

Todd Garsden
Mahoneys
E: [email protected]
P: 07 3007 3753

Tyrone Shandiman
Strata Insurance Solutions
E: [email protected]
P: 1300 554 165

This information is of a general nature only and neither represents nor is intended to be personal advice on any particular matter. Shandit Pty Ltd T/as Strata Insurance Solutions strongly suggests that no person should act specifically on the basis of the information in this document, but should obtain appropriate professional advice based on their own personal circumstances. Shandit Pty Ltd T/As Strata Insurance Solutions is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 404246) of Insurance Advisenent Australia AFSL No 240549, ABN 15 003 886 687.

This post appears in Strata News #745.

Question: Who is responsible for accommodation costs when a lot owner vacates for a builder to carry out repairs under warranty?

The builder is replacing the laminate flooring installed during construction. The same flooring was installed in all units.

Some 70 of 325 owners have reported delamination or movement due to an uneven slab. In most cases, repair is not an option given the extent of delamination.

The developer is an international company that operates globally and the builder is a large Australian company that operates nationally.

Who is responsible for accommodation costs when a lot owner vacates for a builder to carry out repairs under warranty?

Answer: Lot owners may have rights against the builder for the displacement costs

Lot owners are responsible for the maintenance of their lot – which would extend to the flooring within the lot. Each lot owner may then have rights as against the builder for the defects in any flooring to be remedied depending on the terms of the construction contract between the builder and the developer and any rights that can be pursued through the QBCC.

Assuming the builder is responsible for remedying those defects, the lot owners may also have rights to consequential damage against the builder (such as displacement costs). However, this will depend on the specific terms of the construction contract and what can be negotiated with the builder.

Todd Garsden
Mahoneys
E: [email protected]
P: 07 3007 3753

This post appears in the February 2024 edition of The QLD Strata Magazine.

Question: Can our Body Corporate demand Vacant Possession to undertake waterproofing repairs to common property? With no choice to stay in the unit, shouldn’t alternative accommodation be supplied at their cost?

Our complex is located in Queensland. Water penetration remediation works have been approved by the Body Corporate through an AGM motion. The complex has a Building Format Plan and is under the BCCM Act & Accommodation Module Regulations.

The Superintendent of the remedial works has requested, through the Body Corporate and the Body Corporate Manager, Vacant Possession of the unit whilst the works are being undertaken. This could take up to 21 days to complete.

There has not been any offer or consideration of alternate accommodation during that vacant possession period. As well as the cost of securing alternate accommodation for the period of time, I also have concerns about the security of the unit and any damage to furnishings and fixtures whilst the contractors are on site.

As our bedrooms and bathroom areas are located at the opposite end of the unit and would not impact on the contractors performing their work on the terrace, I wonder why Vacant Possession has been requested. Can the Body Corporate demand Vacant Possession without alternatives being offered to undertake the waterproofing works to the terrace?

Answer: If vacant possession is needed to carry out the works, cost should be borne by the body corporate.

It is hard to challenge the basis of what works are required without a competing builder’s report.

If vacant possession is needed to carry out the works (which would seem odd if the works are limited to the balcony only) there is an argument that these costs are consequential to the works the body corporate is responsible for, and should be borne by the body corporate.

Frank Higginson
Hynes Legal
E: [email protected]
P: 07 3193 0500

This post appears in Strata News #261.

Read Next:

  • QLD: Q&A Who Maintains What on My Apartment Balcony?
  • QLD: Rights of Access to Lots

Embed

Visit our Maintenance and Common Property, Strata Building Defects OR FactSheets: Strata Legislation QLD

After a free PDF of this article? Log into your existing LookUpStrata Account to download the printable file. Not a member? Simple – join for free on our Registration page.

Have a question about levy increases or something to add to the article? Leave a comment below.

Share with your strata community

2 shares
  • Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Comments

  1. Edward Strambio says

    May 25, 2021 at 8:29 am

    Question, when a body corporate is authorizing remedial works and maintenance and requires additional funds from owners due to not enough funds in the sinking fund. Is the amount required divided equally between the number of units OR should the amount be divided by the size of the units [1 bedroom and 2 bedroom etc]?

    Reply
    • William Marquand says

      September 27, 2021 at 9:07 am

      Hi,

      The total should be divided by the unit entitlements ascribed to each lot. Effectively this is the second method you are suggesting. You can check the entitlements on your CMS and if you have any questions on the split you should check with your body corporate manager.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search For Strata Articles

  • Advert Stratabox
  • StrataBox Advert
Subscribe Newsletter

TESTIMONIALS

"LookUpStrata should be compulsory reading for every member of a Body Corporate Committee. It provides the most understandable answers to all the common (and uncommon) questions that vex Body Corporates everywhere. Too often Committee members do not understand what Body Corporates are legally able to do and not do. LookUpStrata helps educate everybody living in a Body Corporate environment for free." John, Lot Owner

"It's the best and most professional body corporate information source a strata manager could have! Thanks to the whole team!" MQ, Strata Manager

"I like reading all the relevant articles on important issues on Strata living that the LookUpStrata Newsletter always effectively successfully covers"
Carole, Lot Owner

"Strata is so confusing and your newsletters and website are my go-to to get my questions answered. It has helped me out so many times and is a fabulous knowledge hub." Izzy, Lot Owner

Quick Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Categories

  • Contact a Strata Specialist on the LookUpStrata Directory
  • Ask Us A Strata Question
  • New South Wales
  • Queensland
  • Victoria
  • Australian Capital Territory
  • South Australia
  • Tasmania
  • Western Australia
  • Northern Territory
  • ByLaws & Legislation
  • Smoking
  • Parking
  • Noise & Neighbours
  • Insurance
  • Pets
  • Levies
  • Law Reform
  • Maintenance & Common Property
  • Committee Concerns
  • NBN & Telecommunications
  • Building Defects
  • Renting / Selling / Buying
  • Strata Managers
  • Building Managers and Caretakers
  • Strata Reports / Plans
  • Sustainability

Recent Comments

  • Nikki Jovicic on NSW: Q&A Installing Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Stations in Strata
  • Peter Hayes on NSW: Q&A Installing Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Stations in Strata
  • No1Optimist on NSW: Strata owners, don’t be misled by these questionable manager retention strategies
  • ROSS G ANDERSON on QLD: Navigating Strata Maintenance and Disputes [Includes Flowchart]
  • Nikki Jovicic on NSW: Strata owners, don’t be misled by these questionable manager retention strategies
  • KYM YATES on NSW: Strata owners, don’t be misled by these questionable manager retention strategies
  • Liza Admin on ACT: Q&A Breaching By-Laws. What’s a rule infringement notice?
  • Richard on NSW: Major NSW Strata Reforms Incoming: First Stage Rolls Out 1 July 2025
  • Todd Garsden - Mahoneys on QLD: Removing an Elected Body Corporate Committee Member
  • William Marquand on QLD: Q&A Body Corporate Spending Without Required Approvals

WEBSITE INFORMATION

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions of Use
  • Terms of Use for Comments and Community Discussion
  • Advertising Disclosure
  • Sitemap

ASK A STRATA QUESTION

You’ve Found Strata Help!

Ask a strata, owners corporation or body corporate question and we will do our best to source a useful response from our network of strata professionals around Australia. Submit your question here.

Disclaimer

The opinions and/or views expressed on the LookUpStrata site, including, but not limited to, our blogs and comments, represent the thoughts of individual bloggers and our online communities, and not those necessarily of LookUpStrata Pty Ltd. In all instances, information should not be taken as advice and independent legal advice should be consulted.

CONTACT US VIA EMAIL

Copyright © 2025 · LookUpStrata ® Pty Ltd · All rights reserved