This article about entrance lighting in strata buildings and improving safety in the car park has been provided by Tracey Wyber, Trackie Industries.
Question: Are there any rules about the lighting of driveways or entrance lighting in strata buildings? Does the lighting have to stay on all night?
GET NOTIFIED WHEN WE PUBLISH NEW Q&AS, NEWS AND ARTICLES TO THE SITE
Answer: There are rules as set out in AS 1680 regarding car park driveways and entries that help transition the lighting level upon entry and reduces the effects of blinding.
Yes! There are rules as set out in AS 1680 regarding car park driveways and entries.
In basic terms, Australian Standards: AS 1680 specifies 800 lux for the first 15 meters of a car park entrance during the day and 160 lux at night, followed by 160 lux for the next 4 meters at all times. This helps transition the lighting level upon entry and reduces the effects of blinding.
This post appears in Strata News #276.
Car Park Lighting: Get Compliant & Improve Safety
Make your car park entry compliant
Smart controls and good car park design plays a vital role in protecting vehicles and more importantly their human cargo. Most people don’t link road safety issues and good car park lighting together. One of the most common design failures can be seen in the entry and circulation lanes near the front entrance.
Temporary blinding due to strata building’s car park entrance lighting
When entering a car park, a driver’s eye must adjust quickly, adapting from the bright daylight conditions to the darker car park environment. This transition can lead to temporary blinding, making it difficult for the driver to react to obstacles or pedestrians. Car park entrances can often be located in high pedestrian areas, this temporary loss of clear vision is enough to create serious injuries.
Car park entrances have often been neglected in the design process and as a result, owners or managers of car parks can potentially face large litigation claims if accidents occur at entrances or exits where poor lighting has contributed to the accident.
One of the most common design failures can be seen in the entry and circulation lanes near the front entrance. The Australian standards AS 1680 specifies 800 lux for the first 15 meters of a car park entrance during the day and 160 lux at night, followed by 160 lux for the next 4 meters.
The Solution
Install a car park entry system that uses a twilight sensor to assess the outside light levels to communicate with a smart control lighting system that automatically adjusts the lighting levels to 800 lux in the day time and 160 lux at night.
Embed
Read next:
- Apartment Block Residents Stressed by Fan Noise [Case Study]
- NSW New case law: managing agent and landlord found liable for their tenant’s fall in her apartment
- NSW: Q&A Light Shining Into the Apartment Causing Nuisance
This post appears in Strata News #255.
Tracey Wyber
E: [email protected]
W: Trackie Industries
Visit our Maintenance and Common Property, Apartment Living Sustainability OR Strata Topics by State pages.
After a free PDF of this article Log into your existing LookUpStrata Account to download the printable file. Not a member? Simple – join for free on our Registration page.
Have a question about safety in car parks or something to add to the article? Leave a comment below.
A general question about strata buildings and compliance with Australian standards – do body corporates only have to comply with whatever standards applied when the building was built or do they have to comply with current standards?
Hi Annette
We have received the following from Tracey Wyber, Trackie Industries:
When it comes to lighting it is about the safety of the occupants and their visitors so it is important to comply with current standards for lighting levels. When conducting an LED upgrade you must comply with not only the lighting output standard but also electrical safety standards like residual current devices on lighting circuits.
Hello, who can be held responsible for accidents and injuries sustained as a result of car park entrances not complying? The body corporate committee, the building manager or the body corporate manager? What ANZ standards, apart from the lighting issue you mentioned above, must body corporates comply with?
I am renting in a circa 1996 large, high rise apartment block in Brisbane and my car was damaged when the heavy basement carpark garage door came down on my vehicle.
The only anti-entrapment measure in operation, was the reversing of the door when it came into contact with my vehicle’s roof. Unfortunately, once in reverse mode, the garage door captured my SUV’s roof racks and partially dislodged them from my vehicle.
Two other entrapment measures are installed but are definitely not operating ie. a pair of sensor beams fitted either side of the garage opening and a flashing/beeping siren fitted on the exterior side, above the garage door opening. I have been told that the siren has not worked for a long time and it appears that the sensor beams may have been deliberately switched off.
.
This is an extremely difficult car park to exit from, the lighting is poor, the fob swipe is situated on the far right hand side, which means that entering and exiting traffic has to switch sides. Further complicating the arrangement is the location of 4 visitors car spaces, two each side, located immediately on the other side of the garage door and just before the exterior boom gates. In the short time that I have been there, I have almost been backed into twice as drivers that have parked nose-in cannot easily see that the garage door is about to open. An operating flashing/beeping light is imperative here.
The body corporate has not responded to my concerns about the safety issues, instead fobbing me off to their insurer who offered the following advice:… “We have reviewed your comments regarding our garage doors compliance with building codes. Noting that a building is only required to comply with building codes applicable at the time the building is constructed – we are of the view the door is operational in accordance with the building codes”.
Hi Nikki I have been in communication with the BCCM countless times and have lodged another Form 15 with them over a month ago that is still awaiting case management. Meanwhile nothing changes. I find the BCCM does not follow up once an adjudication has been made and the body corporate simply calls a meeting and the weight of the other four owners votes overturns any compliance issues moving forward. Then we start the process again of paying to lodge a Form 15 and await the outcome. It really is very frustrating being part of this self managed strata scheme. Thanks Di
Hi Di,
I have just emailed you some facts and statistics regarding carpark compliance. Have a look and if more information is required, I’m happy to help.
Regards,
Tracey
Hi Tracey thanks for your response. The complex is on the central coast in Queensland of only 5 lots. The scheme is and has never been compliant as we do not have a sinking fund forecast. The problem I have is that the self managed committee refuses to spend any money. At every AGM I submit motions for exactly this type of thing, but the motions never pass, as the other four lot owners are apparently friends and also share the same view as the 2 committee members about not spending any money. I am at my wits end in regard to maintenance and safety at the complex as sadly for us, the property is deteriorating rapidly, and with it the value of our investment. We live interstate but thankfully have a very proactive property manager. Hope this helps? Cheers Di
Hi Di
Thanks Tracey! We’ve also received this comment from Todd Garsden, Hynes Legal about the committee’s statutory obligations:
The body corporate has a number of statutory obligations that it must comply with irrespective of the cost of the compliance. This extends to maintenance and sinking fund forecasts. If the body corporate refuses to meet these obligations, the owner could make an application in the Commissioner’s Office seeking an order that the body corporate does certain acts to meets those obligations.
Hi Di,
Thankyou for commenting and one solar light certainly does not sound like it would provide sufficient lighting. Can I ask which state you live in? We have people who can help in Sydney, Melbourne and QLD. If not one of those states, I can send you some compliance information once I know a little more about the site.
Regards,
Tracey
This is very interesting as I believe the lighting in our complex is not sufficient only one solar light. However the committee is not interested in hearing anything about it. I have tried to find ways to have this assessed, only to hit a brick wall. Any companies that come out to check on safety issues only do so during the day and therefore cannot check the lighting. What options can we undertake?