Should owners get costs back when repairs are delayed for years?
I've lived through a dispute where the body corporate had independent expert advice on a structural problem for years before it acted. All that time, the cost and the risk sat with the owner, first to keep proving the problem was real, then to force any action at all.
Shouldn't the Act make cost recovery automatic in that situation, once it's shown the advice existed and wasn't acted on? Now, owners have to fight a second, separate battle to get their money back.