Enter your email Address

  • Home
  • What is strata?
    • Strata Legislation
    • What is Strata?
    • Strata Property Basics: Strata Owners Corporation
    • Strata 101: Strata title
    • Understand Strata Management with this Five-Minute Guide
    • Cracking the Strata Fees Code
    • Strata Finance
    • 2021 Updated Guide: Master the Art of Strata Insurance
  • Strata Topics
    • Strata Information By State
      • New South Wales
      • Queensland
      • Victoria
      • Australian Capital Territory
      • South Australia
      • Tasmania
      • Western Australia
      • Northern Territory
    • Strata Information By Topic
      • COVID-19
      • By-Laws & Legislation
      • Smoking
      • Parking
      • Noise & Neighbours
      • Insurance
      • Pets
      • Your Levies
      • New Law Reform
      • Maintenance & Common Property
      • Committee Concerns
      • NBN & Telecommunications
      • Building Defects
      • Renting / Selling / Buying Property
      • Strata Managers
      • Building Managers & Caretakers
      • Strata Plan / Strata Inspection Report
      • Apartment Living Sustainability
  • Blog
    • Newsletter Archives
  • The Strata Magazine
    • The NSW Strata Magazine
    • The QLD Strata Magazine
    • The VIC Strata Magazine
    • The WA Strata Magazine
  • Advertise With Us
    • Site Sponsors
    • LookUpStrata Site Advertising
    • Your Own Branded Newsletter
  • About Us
    • Testimonials for LookUpStrata
  • Help
    • Ask A Strata Question
    • Q&As – about the LookUpStrata site
    • Sitemap

LookUpStrata

Australia's Strata Title Information Site

Whitbread Insurance Brokers
Australia's Top Property Blog Dedicated to Strata Living
You are here: Home / Bylaws / Bylaws NSW / NSW: Challenging Unfair By-Laws – Recent Cases Give Some Guidance

NSW: Challenging Unfair By-Laws – Recent Cases Give Some Guidance

Published October 30, 2018 By David Bannerman, Bannermans Lawyers 2 Comments Last Updated February 23, 2021

Sharing is caring!

0shares

This article about air conditioning issues has been supplied by Bannermans Lawyers.

The commencement of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (“SSMA”) on 30 November 2016 changed the rules concerning strata by-laws. In particular, Section 139(1) provides that a by-law must not be “harsh, unconscionable or oppressive” and Section 150 gives the NSW Civil & Administrative Tribunal (“NCAT”) power to make orders invalidating such a by-law on application by “a person entitled to vote on a motion making a by-law”.

GET NOTIFIED WHEN WE PUBLISH NEW Q&AS, NEWS AND ARTICLES TO THE SITE

The first cases involving Section 150 applications are being decided. These include:

  • A case concerning pet ownership, where a by-law outright prohibiting pet ownership was revoked. Yardy v Owners Corporation SP 57237 [2018] NSWCATCD 19
  • A case where, although finding against the applicant on the basis of other issues, the Member determined that a by-law prohibiting flooring other than carpet was harsh, unconscionable or oppressive, because it failed to include a mechanism for considering minor renovations, which under Section 110, an owner may conduct with approval of the OC. Gurram v Owners Corporation SP36589 [2017] NSWCAT

Advert NSW Mag Banner

In these cases, the Members spent some time considering what the terms “harsh, unconscionable or oppressive” mean, so they should be considered when making by-laws or considering challenging them under Section 150.

The key findings seem to be:

  • Establishing that a by-law is “harsh, unconscionable or oppressive” requires more than demonstrating that the by-law is unreasonable.
  • A pets by-law may be “harsh unconscionable or oppressive” if:
    • it is “a blunt instrument which imposes a complete prohibition upon the keeping of animals as pets, with no exceptions” and “provides no means by which the special circumstances of particular lot owners might be considered”.
    • it “unreasonably and unnecessarily precludes the exercise of a right of habitation which the Tribunal considers is part of contemporary community standards associated with the rights of owners and occupiers of lots in strata schemes”.
    • it “is based on the interests of only one side of the issues associated with the keeping of animals as pets”.
  • A by-law dealing with flooring or other renovations issues may be “harsh unconscionable or oppressive” if it fails to provide for consideration of works which constitute “minor renovations”.
  • Any by-law regulating activity within a strata scheme may be vulnerable to challenge if it:
    • Imposes a complete prohibition on some activity and provides no means by which the special circumstances of particular lot owners might be considered.
    • Unreasonably and unnecessarily precludes some incident of domestic life consistent with contemporary community standards associated with the rights of owners and occupiers of lots in strata schemes.

We have considerable experience with these issues and can assist if you are having difficulties with them.
This post appears in Strata News #215.

Bannermans Lawyers
Telephone (02) 9929 0226
Suite 702, 2 Elizabeth Plaza
North Sydney NSW 2060

This article has been republished with permission from the author and first appeared on the Bannermans Lawyers website.

***The information contained in this article is general information only and not legal advice. The currency, accuracy and completeness of this article (and its contents) should be checked by obtaining independent legal advice before you take any action or otherwise rely upon its contents in any way.

Visit our Maintenance and Common Property OR NSW Strata Legislation

After a free PDF of this article? Log into your existing LookUpStrata Account to download the printable file. Not a member? Simple – join for free on our Registration page.

Comments

  1. AvatarDavid Bannerman says

    April 7, 2020 at 1:09 pm

    Hi Mike,

    I would need to review the by-law to be able to determine whether it could be considered harsh, oppressive or unconscionable. It may be that the provisions in regards to access are in conflict with the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015, and therefore unenforceable or of no force or effect.

    Regardless, the owners corporation can seek access to repair and maintain the common property under section 122 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015. If the owner refuses, the owners corporation can seek orders for access through NCAT.

    Feel free to send it through to [email protected]

    Thanks

    Reply
  2. AvatarMike Condon says

    April 6, 2020 at 8:05 pm

    I’m a new owner in a 100 lot strata scheme. An extremely well written by-law approved at the time the 1970’s building’s original developer ‘held sway‘, garnered one Lot exclusive used of rooftop ‘utility rooms’.

    These were stealthily converted to residential use as a penthouse-style apartment.

    The current owner of the Lot granted this use, has hampered attempts to repair a leaking roof membrane, with his power of veto written in to the By-Law.

    Does this constitute a harsh, oppressive By-Law, where a single lot owner’s exclusive right to access common areas is now preventing the Owners Corporation to carry out essential repairs?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search For Strata Articles

  • Advert Stratabox
  • StrataBox Advert
  • Advert: StrataLoans
  • Advert: StrataLoans
  • Advert: StrataLoans
Subscribe Newsletter

TESTIMONIAL

"The newsletter is very helpful and gives great guidance with commonly asked questions." Gayle, Lot Owner – November 2020
"I love your regular emails and now this fantastic magazine! Keep up the great work. " David, Lot Owner – August 2020

Quick Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Categories

  • COVID-19
  • Ask A Strata Question
  • New South Wales
  • Queensland
  • Victoria
  • Australian Capital Territory
  • South Australia
  • Tasmania
  • Western Australia
  • Northern Territory
  • ByLaws & Legislation
  • Smoking
  • Parking
  • Noise & Neighbours
  • Insurance
  • Pets
  • Levies
  • Law Reform
  • Maintenance & Common Property
  • Committee Concerns
  • NBN & Telecommunications
  • Building Defects
  • Renting / Selling / Buying
  • Strata Managers
  • Building Managers and Caretakers
  • Strata Reports / Plans
  • Sustainability

Recent Comments

  • Jana Koutova on QLD: Q&A Body Corporate Audits and Tax
  • Helen on QLD: Q&A Can I Access Body Corporate Records?
  • IRENE on SCA (WA): Three Changes Strata is Crying Out for at This WA Election
  • Tim coulson on ACT: Common Property Boundary Lines – Class A and Class B
  • Katy on NSW: Q&A What Happens When The Common Property is Not So Common?
  • Deborah And Peter Bayliss on QLD: Q&As Management Rights, Extensions and the Committee’s Decision
  • Bess Fowler on WA: Q&A What are the Strata Manager’s Duties and Do We Really Need One?
  • Tammy Tillman on NSW: Invasion of Privacy by CCTV Cameras
  • Frustrated with strata saying it's not their responsibility on NSW: Q&A Smoke Alarms in Strata Units
  • John on QLD: Q&A Can a Lot Owner Access Body Corporate CCTV Footage?

WEBSITE INFORMATION

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions of Use
  • Terms of Use for Comments and Community Discussion
  • Advertising Disclosure
  • Sitemap

SCA Membership

SCA WA Membership

ASK A STRATA QUESTION

Disclaimer

The opinions and/or views expressed on the LookUpStrata site, including, but not limited to, our blogs and comments, represent the thoughts of individual bloggers and our online communities, and not those necessarily of LookUpStrata Pty Ltd. In all instances, information should not be taken as advice and independent legal advice should be consulted.

CONTACT US VIA EMAIL

Copyright © 2021 · LookUpStrata ® Pty Ltd · All rights reserved